Schedule
This schedule is your go-to resource for the most up-to-date syllabus, reading materials, and assignments. While we will strive to stick to this schedule, please understand that it is not set in stone – updates may occur. Should there be any important changes to the schedule, assignments, or reading materials, you’ll receive an email notification!
Here’s a quick overview to the different types of class meetings we’ll have:
- Discussion: Sessions that combine lecturing with discussions, emphasizing critical engagement with the assigned materials.
- Lab: Hands-on sessions applying concepts in a practical setting.
- Present: Sessions where students present their projects or research.
- Field Trip: Visit to Princeton University Library Special Collections.
Week 1 - Intro to and Foundations of Digital Humanities
In this module, we will take our time to become acquinted with the contours that delineate the field known as Digital Humanities. We discuss what are the essential or minimal ingredients (if there are any), and critically examine various definitions. We traverse the landscape of Digital Humanities and explore how early definitions of the field differ from more recent attempts at defining it.
↪ Sept 3 Discussion Acquaintances
↪ Sep 5 Discussion Foundations
- Slides
- Pre-Class Reflection:
- Examine this website, hit the New Quote-button a few times, and read the definition that appears. Some guiding questions:
- How do the definitions you encounter vary each time you refresh the page? What does this diversity tell you about the nature of Digital Humanities as a field? What are the commonalities between the definitions? What are the differences? Consider the role technology plays in these definitions. Is it merely a tool, or does it fundamentally reshape the humanities?
- Burdick, A., Drucker J., Lunenfeld P. et al., “I. Humanities to Digital Humanities.” Digital_Humanities, MIT Press, 2012, pp. 3–26.
- Kirschenbaum, Matthew. 2012. “What Is Digital Humanities and What’s It Doing in English Departments?” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, 3–11. University of Minnesota Press.
- Post your reflection in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
- Examine this website, hit the New Quote-button a few times, and read the definition that appears. Some guiding questions:
Week 2 - Data Culture(s)
This week we survey the expansive terrain of Digital Humanities. First, we’ll engage in a discussion on ‘data’ as a core concept, and the methodologies that propel the field forward. Later on this week, we focus on practical applications of metadata and data description.
↪ Sept 10 Discussion Getting our data together
- Pre-Class Exercise:
- Play around with Google’s Ngram Viewer to investigate two terms of your choice (e.g. ‘car’ vs. ‘automobile’). Analyze and interpret the trends you observe. Consider the following: what intriguing patterns – if any – emerge? Can specific historical events explain shifts in the usage of these terms? You are welcome to do a quick online search to support your interpretations, but keep it concise – no more than three sentences for each term.
- Post your analysis along with a screenshot of your NGram search in the #ngrams channel on Slack before the day of our class.
- Pre-Class Perusall Annotation (no Slack reflection, just annotations on Perusall!):
- Ramsay, Stephen. 2014. “The Hermeneutics of Screwing Around; or What You Do with a Million Books.” In Pastplay: Teaching and Learning History with Technology, edited by Kevin B. Kee, 111–20. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
↪ Sept 12 Guest Lecture Metadata and data description
- Slides by Sarah Reiff Conell.
- Pre-Class Perusall Annotation (no Slack reflection, just annotations on Perusall!)
- Drucker, Johanna. “Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 1, 2011.
- Make sure your annotations are added in Perusall on the day before our class.
Week 3 - From Artifacts to Data
In this module, we investigate the critical procedures involved in data creation and cleaning, and how OpenRefine can be used in this process. In our second session, we will pay a visit to the Princeton University’s Special Collections where will take a tour of the Digitization Studio.
↪
Sept 17
Lab
Data Cleaning
CANCELED
- Slides (coming soon!)
- Slack Reflection and Perusall Annotations:
- Schöch, Christof. “Big? Smart? Clean? Messy? Data in the Humanities.” Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 2, no. 3, 2013.
- Rawson, Katie, and Muñoz Trevor. “Against Cleaning.” Debates in the Digital Humanities, University of Minnesota Press, 2019, pp. 279–92.
- Make sure your annotations are added in Perusall and your reflection is posted in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
↪ Sept 19 Field Trip Special Collections Studio Tour
- For this class, we’ll meet at the Firestone Library, C-level (“the bunker”) at 11:00AM.
- Pre-Class Activities (no Perusall annotations, nor reflection required!):
- Familiarize yourself with the Princeton’s Digital Repository to get a sense of the extent of Princeton University’s digitized materials. Specifically, explore The Infant’s Library from the Cotsen Children’s Library. Reflect on how the physical characteristics of this item - a miniature bookcase with books! - are represented digitally. Consider how well the digitization captures the physicality of the item.
- Listen to this podcast episode, where Dot Porter (Curator of Digital Research Services at UPenn’s Schoenberg Institute for Manuscript Studies) is interviewed by Stewart Varner (Managing Director of the Price Lab at UPenn).
Week 4 - Molding and Modeling Data
In this module, we investigate the critical procedures involved in data creation and cleaning, and how OpenRefine can be used in this process. These processes invariably entail the making of mindful decisions. During our second session this week, we will look at the technology behind making text digitally readable.
↪ Sept 24 Lab Data Cleaning
- Slides
- Slack Reflection and Perusall Annotations:
- Schöch, Christof. “Big? Smart? Clean? Messy? Data in the Humanities.” Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 2, no. 3, 2013.
- Rawson, Katie, and Muñoz Trevor. “Against Cleaning.” Debates in the Digital Humanities, University of Minnesota Press, 2019, pp. 279–92.
- In case you haven’t already – make sure your annotations are added in Perusall and your reflection is posted in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
↪ Sept 26 Discussion Text Recognition Technologies, pt. I
- Slides
- Slack Reflection (no Perusall annotations required for this session!):
- Terras, Melissa. “The Role of the Library When Computers Can Read: Critically Adopting Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) Technologies to Support Research.” The Rise of AI, edited by Amanda Wheatley and Sandy Hervieux, ACRL - Association of College & Research Libraries, 2022, pp. 137–48.
- Read the blog post “What is handwriting recognition and how does it work?” on the Transkribus team’s website.
- Make sure your reflection is posted in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
Week 5 - Text Digitization (pt. II) and Distant Reading (pt. I)
During our first session this week, we will continue with our exploring of Handwritten Text Recognition (HTR) and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) technologies. In the second session, we will shift our focus to Distant Reading, a method of analyzing large bodies of text to uncover patterns and trends that are not immediately apparent.
↪ Oct 1 Lab Text Recognition Technologies, pt. II
↪ Oct 3 Lab Distant Reading
- Slides
- Pre-Class Perusall annotations (no Slack reflection required!):
- Underwood, Ted. “A Genealogy of Distant Reading.” Digital Humanities Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 2, 2017.
- Klein, Lauren F. “The Image of Absence: Archival Silence, Data Visualization, and James Hemings.” American Literature, vol. 85, no. 4, Dec. 2013, pp. 661–88.
- Make sure your annotations are added in Perusall on the day before our class.
Week 6 - Distant Reading (pt. II) and Data Biographies
This week begins with a hands-on lab session where we will be leveraging the web-based Voyant Tools, known for their user-friendly, powerful capabilities for visual text analysis. This module is designed to be both instructive and engaging, providing you with practical experience using digital tools to analyze large textual data sets. Drawing inspiration from the works of El Khatib and Ross (2022), we will conduct an ecological reading of Emily Brontë’s novel Jane Eyre, and an exploratory thematic analysis of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein.
↪ Oct 8 Lab Applying Voyant Tools
↪ Oct 10 Present Data Biographies
- Slides
- On this day, students will present their Data Biographies. This is a chance to share the intriguing stories behind the datasets you’ve explored!
- Each presentation should last approximately – but also no more than – 4 minutes, followed by a brief (~1 minute) Q&A/feedback session.
- Focus on the narrative of your Data Biography, presenting on aspects you find interesting, such as origin, collector(s), collection method(s), intended use, and any limitations or ethical considerations.
- Use visuals or excerpts from your dataset to illustrate your points and engage the audience.
- For more details, refer to the assignment description.
- Presentation guidelines:
- Maximum of five (5) slides per presentation, and a very strict time limit of four - 4! - minutes. You will be cut off if you exceed this limit!
- Please add your slides to the shared slide deck (link coming soon) before the start of the class.
- Order of presentations (TBA)
🍂 Fall Recess 🍂
Enjoy a well-deserved break!
Week 7 - Topic Modeling
Topic modeling is a useful tool for exploring large collections of text. It can be used to identify themes in a corpus, to identify outliers, and to explore the relationships between different texts. It is a form of unsupervised machine learning, which means that it does not require a human to provide a training set of labeled data. During the first session of this week, we will look at how the sieving out of topics works, and how to interpret the results. In the second session, Laure Thompson will visit our class and we’ll use jsLDA to build a topic model of our own!
↪ Oct 22 Discussion Topic Modeling
- Slides
- Pre-Class Reflection → no Perusall annotations required for these readings!
- Froehlich, Heather. Moby Dick Is About Whales, or Why Should We Count Words?.
- Blei, David M. “Topic Modeling and Digital Humanities.” Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 2, no. 1, 2012.
- Nelson, Robert K. Mining the Dispatch.
- Post your reflection in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
↪ Oct 24 Lab Topic Modeling with jsLDA
- Slides
- Data, and other resources (prepared and taught by dr. Laure Thompson):
- jsLDA website
- Data
- Themes identified from 3,000 volumes of Speculative Fiction (SF) from the HathiTrust digital library.
- Pre-Class Skimming (no Perusall annotations, nor reflection required!):
- Boyd-Graber, Jordan, et al. “Applications of Topic Models.” Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, vol. 11, no. 2–3, 2017, pp. 143–296. → This is a big one! No need to read in depth; become acquainted with chapters 1.1, 1.2 (+ 1.3 if you want to get a bit more technical), chapter 3, and chapter 6.
- Antoniak, Maria. A Computational Reading of a Birth Stories Community. 5 Nov. 2019.
Week 8 - Stylometry
In this module, we will discover the world of stylometry, a field that probes the unique stylistic fingerprint of authors. Utilizing the user-friendly package Stylo, we will undertake a critical review and replication of Patrick Juola’s study (2013), which aimed to reveal the author hiding behind the pseudonym Robert Galbraith. In doing so, we will not only explore the power of stylometric techniques, but also discuss the broader implications of this type of research, emphasizing the ethical and scholarly consequences.
↪ Oct 29 Discussion Stylometry
- Slides
- Pre-Class Perusall Annotation (no Slack reflection, just annotations on Perusall!)
- Whissell, Cynthia. “Traditional and Emotional Stylometric Analysis of the Songs of Beatles Paul McCartney and John Lennon.” Computers and the Humanities, vol. 30, no. 3, 1996, pp. 257–65.
- Holmes, David I., and Judit Kardos. “Who Was the Author? An Introduction to Stylometry.” Chance, vol. 16, no. 2, 2003, pp. 5–8.
- Make sure your annotations are added in Perusall on the day before our class.
↪ Oct 31 Lab Authorship Attribution with Stylo
- Slides
- Pre-Class Reflection (no Perusall annotations, just a reflection on Slack!):
-
Binongo, José Nilo G. “Who Wrote the 15th Book of Oz? An Application of Multivariate Analysis to Authorship Attribution.” Chance, vol. 16, no. 2, Mar. 2003, pp. 9–17.
Disclaimer
The readings listed below are part of this week’s lab effort to replicate Patrick Juola’s analysis on the authorship of J.K. Rowling. It is however crucial to recognize that J.K. Rowling has become a figure of controversy owing to her remarks concerning the transgender community. The decision to include her work in our study does not equate to an endorsement of her opinions or a promotion of her work. Our goal is to undertake a computational examination of Rowling’s writings, analyzing the stylistic distinctions between works published under her own name and those released under a pseudonym. The readings listed below are part of a broader discussion on the importance and challenges of addressing controversial creators and topics in Digital Humanities. I am curious about your insights. Can we separate our study of J.K. Rowling’s authorship from her personal opinions, allowing the field of Digital Humanities to persist in its computational analysis of her work (and for me to continue incorporating this case in stylometry classes), or should we consider refraining from including her in our research altogether?
- Juola, Patrick. “Rowling and ‘Galbraith’: An Authorial Analysis.” Language Log, 2013.
- McNamara, Mary. “Commentary: Here’s an Idea: Maybe If We All Stop Talking about J.K. Rowling, She’ll Just Go Away.” Los Angeles Times, 21 Feb. 2023. Perusall link to the article.
- Dederer, Claire. “Chapter 3. The Fan.” Monsters. A Fan’s Dilemma, Alfred A. Knopf, 2023.
- Post your reflection in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
-
Week 9 - Network Analysis
This week, we continue our exploration of visualization in Digital Humanities with a focus on network analysis. Building on our discussion on data visualization, we’ll look at web-based platforms like Flourish and software like Gephi and learn how network analysis provides valuable insights into relational data.
↪ Nov 5 Discussion Network Analysis I
- Slides
- Pre-Class Reflection and Perusall Annotations:
- Weingart, Scott B. “Demystifying Networks, Parts I & II.” Journal of Digital Humanities, vol. 1, no. 1, 2011.
- Rhodes Ii, Mark Alan. “Paul Robeson’s Place in YouTube: A Social Spatial Network Analysis of Digital Heritage.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, vol. 34, no. 1, Apr. 2019, pp. 174–88.
- Post your reflection in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
Week 10 - 'Making' in DH and GIS
This module introduces the hands-on dimension of Digital Humanities research, focusing on how “making” is becoming an essential part of its practice. We’ll explore the role of embodiment in research through activities like 3D printing, electronics, and other forms of physical creation. This will set the stage for our upcoming lab on GIS, by examining how physical and spatial perspectives can enhance DH projects.
↪ Nov 12 Field Trip Makerspace
- We will meet at the Makerspace in the Lewis Science Library, A-level at 11:00AM. No need to bring your laptop to this session!
↪ Nov 14 Lab GIS
- Slides
- Pre-Class Reflection and Perusall Annotations (Perusall annotations only required for the first—Presner et al. (2014)—reading!):
- Presner, Todd Samuel, et al. HyperCities: Thick Mapping in the Digital Humanities. Harvard University Press, 2014. Read the following chapters: Lexicon (pp. 12-21) & Thick Mapping in the Digital Humanities (pp. 49-65).
- Spend some time on this webiste Mapping Inequality and explore the maps and data visualizations.
Week 11 - Guest Lecture & Python for the Curious
In the first session this week, we welcome a guest discussion led by Paavo Van der Eecken (University of Antwerp), a visiting Fulbright scholar working in Digital Humanities. Paavo’s research focuses on the annotation of age, race, class, and gender in the illustrations of historical children’s literature. His talk will provide insights into how data-driven approaches intersect with the study of visual and cultural representation.
The second session will explore the role of coding in the humanities with a gentle introduction to Python, a programming language as approachable as it is powerful. Our session will provide a panoramic view of Python’s syntax and its practical applications in Humanities research. Ultimately, the goal of this week is to get a taste of programming in Python, with fear being an exception that is not allowed to interrupt the process.
Or, stated in a Pythonic way:
try:
learn_python()
except Fear as obstacle:
handle(obstacle) # apply strategies to overcome fear
else:
print('Congratulations on embracing coding literacy!') # celebrate
↪ Nov 19 Discussion Annotating Diversity in Children's Literature
- Slides (coming soon!)
- Pre-Class Reading (no Perusall annotations required, only a reflection on Slack!):
- Edmond, Jennifer. “Managing Uncertainty in the Humanities: Digital and Analogue Approaches.” Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, ACM, 2018, pp. 840–44.
- Scheuerman, Morgan Klaus, et al. “Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Development.” Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 5, no. CSCW2, Oct. 2021, pp. 1–37.
- Post your reflection in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
↪ Nov 21 Lab Coding Literacy
- Notebook
- Pre-Class Reflection (no Perusall annotations required, only a reflection on Slack!):
- Schmidt, Benjamin M. “Do Digital Humanists Need to Understand Algorithms?” Debates in the Digital Humanities, vol. 53, 2016.
- Vee, Annette. “Introduction. Computer Programming as Literacy.” Coding Literacy: How Computer Programming Is Changing Writing, The MIT Press, 2017.
- Post your reflection in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
🦃 Thanksgiving Recess 🌽
Week 12 - Roles, Responsibilities, and the Future
In our concluding week, we will revisit the topics explored throughout the semester, reflecting on the ethical dimensions of Digital Humanities and considering critical issues such as algorithmic bias and transparency in the age of AI. This will help frame the ongoing and future work of (digital) humanities scholars. The first session (Dec. 3) will be held remotely and will feature a discussion-based format, providing an opportunity to wrap up the class, ask final questions, and look ahead. For the second session (Dec. 5), there will be no live class. Instead, you will submit and asynchronously review recorded work-in-progress presentations.
↪ Dec 3 Discussion Roles & Responsibilities
- Slides
- No live class! Click here for the Zoom link!
- Pre-Class Reflection (no Perusall annotations required, only a reflection on Slack!):
- Presner, Todd, et al. Digital Humanities Manifesto 2.0. 2009, pp. 1–15.
- Lauren Klein, Data Feminism for AI, SJSU Digital Humanities Center. October 17, 2024.
- Post your reflection in the #reflections channel on Slack no later than 11:59PM on the day before our class.
↪ Dec 5 Present Work-in-Progress Presentations
- No live class will be held for this session.
- Instead, submit a 4~5 minute work-in-progress video presentation detailing the current state of your final assignment. This is an opportunity to share ideas, express doubts, and gather feedback from your peers and instructor.
- Consider addressing the following points in your presentation
- Narrative/research question/hypothesis/reasons why your project is important
- Dataset identification and collection/potential issues with the data (with or without solutions)
- DH methods/tools/frameworks that you are considering implementing
- Challenges you are facing
- Submission guidelines
- Videos must be uploaded to the designated folder (referenced on Slack, see here) by 11:59 PM on Dec 4.
- Name your file as:
Lastname_Firstname_PresentationTitle.mov|mp4|...
. - Keep your presentation within the 5-minute limit.
- You may use any recording software (e.g., Zoom, QuickTime).
- While optional, using slides or screen sharing to support your points is highly recommended.
- Feedback expectations
- Videos will be shared on Perusall for asynchronous peer feedback and discussion. Link will be shared here once all videos are collected!
- You are required to provide feedback on at least two peer presentations using a rubric that will be shared in advance.
- Peer feedback is due by 11:59 PM on Dec 6.
- Once again…
- The video presentation shows your work-in-progress, so it is 100% okay if you are still figuring out some of the specifics of your project! Use the opportunity to put forward questions/doubt and explore your ideas.